So we've finally made it to the last installment of my four part analysis of the Gomez and Drury signings. The last major issue to analyze is how the signings will effect the Rangers in light of the new salary cap system introduced in the NHL. Some would have us believe that the teams' signings of Scott Gomez and Chris Drury have placed a noose around the team's financial neck for years to come. We know that the team is up against the "cap wall" for this season. What about the future? Will the Rangers be financially paralyzed for the 2008-09 season? Take a look at this list:
1. Brendan Shanahan: $2.5m base.$2.8m bonuses: $5.3m per season
2. Martin Straka: $3.3m per season
3. Paul Mara: $3.0m per season
4. Darius Kaspasraitis: $2.989m per season
5. Michal Rozsival: $2.5m per season
6. Jason Strudwick: $500,000 per season
7. Andrew Hutchinson: $475,000 per season.
That's a list of players who's contracts are expiring after the upcoming season. With the exception of Roszival (possibly), none of them will be back (unless they're willing to play for a steep discount). What that means is that the Rangers will have over $18m of cap space just from these players.
Sean Avery and his $1.9m contract will also expire at seasons end as does Marcel Hossa's $780,000 contract. If the Rangers are unwilling or unable to resign either of these players, the cap picture looks even better.
Obviously, some of the teams core players will become RFA's looking for raises. Most notably, Henrik Lundqvist and Fedor Tyutin. However, it appears as though signing these players shouldn't be a problem given the amount of money that will be freed up at seasons end.
Granted, the Rangers will have to fill the vacancies created by these players' departures. Here's where the Rangers' critics jump in: they argue that since the team has committed nearly $15m per season for just two players, how can the Rangers possibly expect to have enough money left over to round out the rest of their roster?!? They point to the Tampa Bay Lightning as an example of the dangers wrought by investing too much money into too few players. These, critics, however, are missing one crucial point: The Rangers have quality prospects who can be used to fill out roster spots, Tampa doesn't. In fact, Hockey's Future ranked the Rangers sixth (6th) in the NHL in terms of the quality of its prospects while Tampa was ranked 29th!. By filling roster spots with young players the Rangers will be able to keep their cap charge down since these players are still playing out their relatively cheap entry level contracts. Here's a list (by position) of some notable prospects who should be ready to step in by 2008-09:
1. Al Montoya- Goaltender. This kid looks like the real deal and is probably ready to play in the NHL now. The emergence of Lundqvist, however, makes Montoya the odd man out. Look for the Rangers to trade him at some point. He should be able to fetch a handsome return.
2. Marc Staal- Defense. All indications are that the Rangers have got themselves a gem. Staal should definitely be able to take one of the roster spots that will become available with the departure of all of the aforementioned defenseman currently on the Rangers' roster.
3. Bobby Sanguinetti- Defense. Here's part of what Hockey's Future says, "Sanguinetti has the potential to be a member of an NHL first defensive pairing." What I like most about the kid is that he's thrilled to be a Ranger having grown up idolizing Brian Leetch.
The Rangers also have Thomas Pock and Dan Girardi who have already spent some time with the big club in promising stints. These guys will presumably be able to fill some of the vacancies on the blue line in 2008-09. The most important thing about them (in terms of salary cap analysis) is that they'll be relatively cheap.
Up front, the Rangers have well known prospects Nigel Dawes, Brandon Dubinsky, Artem Anisimov and Ryan Callahan battling for roster spots this season. By 2008-09, some of these guys should be able to fill the spots vacated by Straka, Shannahan and perhaps Avery. In addition, the Rangers also have a number of other quality prospects up front. Most notably, Alex Bourret, Brodie Dupont and Lauri Korpikoski. Last, but certainly not least is this seasons #1 draft pick Alexei Cherapanov who may very well turn into a special player for the New York Rangers.
It would certainly appear that the Rangers have the young talent necessary to round out their roster. If the team needed to look towards free agency to fill every roster spot then, perhaps, there would be cap trouble on the horizon. Fortunately, however, that is not the case. Some of these young players should be able to adequately fill roles that will be opened in the near future. These players are still relatively cheap as they are playing under their entry level contracts. Over-all, the cap outlook in New York looks pretty encouraging.
The beauty of the Gomez and Drury signings are that the Rangers have their core centerman locked up for years to come. The incoming young talent will be asked to play supporting roles rather then primary ones. That's a huge bonus for young players learning the ins and outs of the best league in all of hockey. The presence of Gomez and Drury should help ease the transitions that these youngsters will face.
The Blueshirt Bulletin recently ran a great feature praising the Rangers' ability to rebuild while dressing a competitive team. With Gomez, Drury and Lunqvist in the fold and the impressive stable of young talent already in the system, the Rangers should be able to continue that trend into the foreseeable future.
If the Rangers' youngsters do in fact realize their potential on Broadway, not only will the Rangers not be in cap trouble, on the contrary, New York fans may get to see the likes on Dany Heatley or Wade Redden playing at The World's Most Famous Arena!
It goes without saying that I give Slats & Co. two very enthusiastic thumbs up for the signings of Gomez and Drury. The Rangers are unquestionably a better team today then they were at the end of last season. Given the strength of the teams' prospects, I believe that the future cap outlook for the team is just fine. The Rangers should be competitive for years to come with Gomez and Drury anchoring their top two lines.
Don't forget to check out the first three parts of the analysis over here, here and here.
I have to hand it to you, Hockey Rabbi. You spend a great deal of time and effort to keep everyone informed and keep RANGER-talk ongoing.
The Dark Ranger is bored -- i am actually watching Cablevision re-broadcasts of Fan Favorite Ranger games from last season, and it reminded me of how powerful an arsenal of young-in's can do for a franchise. Back of last season, when every veteran player was out, it took a couple of AHL'ers, Girardi and Callahan to show the pro's what you are talking about. Consider Pittsburgh one of the strongest opponents in our division, an extremely young roster of talent -- with a couple of veteran enforcers to balance out. When actually, I think the Rangers are perfectly poised for greatness this season -- an incredible mix of both -- and an actual (dare we say) farm-team approach? The Rangers developing talent? Wow. You and now now are 'on record' for saying that.
Frankly, I think Avery might just stick around if Slats can strike a deal just after the New Year -- no other city will respond to this guy like MSG.
Exciting stuff...nice work.
tdr
Posted by: The Dark Ranger | August 06, 2007 at 02:20 PM
Thanks. I appreciate you taking the time to read my posts!
Posted by: The Hockey Rabbi | August 06, 2007 at 02:39 PM
I agree with you guys- especially you, Rabbi. I just hope that these potentially available spots are given to the "young-ins", because if they're not, the team will be a mirror of the late '90's squads. Also, I couldn't agree with you more about the Montoya situation. Thats about the best position a GM could be in. If Sather does in fact opt to move Montoya & doesn't bring in a hefty return on that trade then I guess he never will.
Posted by: MOSS | August 07, 2007 at 05:21 AM
I honestly dont think the Lightning are doing anything wrong investing so much into three players. The team lives on offense - they have to, their goaltending is awful at best - that's why they invest so much in the Tampa Trio. Those three are the only ones who give the Bolts a chance to win. And if you look at the actual cap, the Bolts are about 6.3 million below.
Posted by: Debbie | August 07, 2007 at 06:19 AM
Debbie:
Aside from overpaying Brad Richards I don't have any problems with Tampa's decision to invest in the "Tampa Trio". The problem they have, in my opinion, is that they don't have enough good prospects to fill out their roster. Signing free agents to fill every hole is just too expensive nowadays.
Posted by: The Hockey Rabbi | August 07, 2007 at 06:31 AM
This is a great, informative post. Thanks for putting together; I enjoyed the read.
Posted by: Steve Soldwedel | August 08, 2007 at 07:35 AM
Kaspar will be sent down, and Mara, I believe, will be a free agent at the end of the year. Roszy will probably ask for at least 4 per, and won't get that. My big issue is with Jagr's salary next year. I am not positive about it, so please correct me if I am wrong, but right now the caps are paying half of it. After this year /i think the rangers pick up that half. Basically, the Rangers will be in some serious trouble next year with the cap, unless the cap rises again.
Posted by: Bryan | August 12, 2007 at 07:57 AM
Are you planning on writing anything else or should we forget about you?
Hello! Where's the beef?
Posted by: Your neighboring klutz | August 14, 2007 at 10:01 AM
This post makes me realize the energy of words and pictures. As consistently your points are just gorgeous and I am grateful that you let us look in! Have a decent week!
Posted by: Puma Shoes | August 16, 2010 at 05:51 PM